Speaking at The PIE Live Europe in London this week, Clare Foyle, director of tactical planning at UCL, told the audience that the levy would be “taken in into our normal thinking about tuition charges” instead of passed on straight to international trainees.
“We have actually decided that [the levy] will not be passed on. It definitely won’t be on the invoice,” she said.
Foyle acknowledged that absorbing the costs– which is most likely to strike UCL the hardest of any university, based upon its 2023/24 enrolment data– would undoubtedly have a knock-on impact other things it would have the ability to buy, such as classroom advancement or technical devices.
“We’re absolutely going to try and safeguard the things that we believe are really, really essential for trainees, however it will slow down a few of the new and innovative things that we were wanting to do,” she said.
“We would not see it as taking anything away, however it just slows down our procedure,” she included.
We’re absolutely going to attempt and secure the things that we think are truly, actually crucial for trainees, but it will slow down some of the new and ingenious things that we were wanting to do
Clare Foyle, UCL
The panellists checked out how other English institutions would decide to grapple with the levy throughout a session exploring the effect of the upcoming policy, which is anticipated to be implemented in 2028. Only English universities will be impacted by the policy, with Welsh politicians unquestionably specifying that they would not be enforcing a levy on organizations in Wales.
“The monetary pressures are really pressing the sector to be more reactive, instead of proactive,” mentioned Janet Ilieva, creator and director of Education Insight, highlighting that some universities were stopping less popular programs– such as languages or agriculture– that, ironically, typically have a few of the highest conclusion rates.
“This is where the sector holes up into an extremely reactive area, which erodes many margins,” she warned.
A straw poll of the audience suggested that most English universities are still weighing up their alternatives when it concerns choosing whether to up tuition fees in response to the policy.
Session chair Vincenzo Raimo, a worldwide college specialist, stated this tallied with the discussions he had been having with universities– that a lot of were exploring their choices or else waiting to see how others would react to the policy before making a company decision by themselves strategy, although others said they would be passing the costs directly on to trainees.
“I believe many universities will try and stay with increased volume instead of thinking about the quality and the price point,” recommended Jamie Warner, an independent higher education finance consultant.
The introduction of the levy has been a particularly controversial policy from the UK’s Labour federal government, with critics mentioning that the college sector– currently strapped for money– could see a mass exodus of enrolments from price-sensitive sending out countries.
Ilieva said that the UK was already losing market share to emerging locations due to the growing multi-polarity of the sector.
She indicated research study suggesting that a few of the key sending countries to the UK– India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka– are particularly rate sensitive. And with continuous hostilities in need affecting fuel rates and in turn inflation, she warned that the policy might not be coming at an even worse time.
“This is the time when long-lasting sustainable engagement matters one of the most. So, I would urge policy makers [to] reconsider. This is a strategic mistake– badly timed, badly executed,” Ilieva stated.
Nic Dillon, director of the Nous Group, highlighted that the levy policy isn’t occurring in a vacuum, with modifications to Basic Compliance Assessment (BCA) metrics, modifications to visa guidelines for dependants and discussions about worldwide trainees seeking asylum all collaborating to develop an ideal storm for UK global education.
But he said that despite the difficulties to the sector, some institutions were already setting their international costs at the incorrect level.
“Lots of, many universities are already pricing incorrect by far more than the ₤ 925 of the levy,” he stated. “So eventually, we’re handling our own errors of this magnitude. This [the levy] is just the federal government adding another one.”
On the other hand, partner at CIL Technique Professional Patric Kirchner echoed that many universities’ prices was “still quite immature” and not always value-based.
“It’s more like a process. So you need to run this procedure every year, you look at in 2015’s costs, then you maybe mark it up a bit here and there. But from my experience, what I’ve learned over the last month, it’s not very strategic,” he stated.
< img src="https://thepienews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/submit-your-nominations.jpg" alt =""/ >