Canada’s minister of migration, refugees and citizenship, Lena Metlege Diab, introduced the modifications on May 6, which she stated would “protect [migration] applicants from fraud and misbehavior” and strengthen the integrity of the system.
The new guidelines will work on July 15. They include strengthening the discipline procedure for experts who break the guidelines and broadening the general public register from April 2027 making it simpler to confirm consultants’ credentials and harder for unlicensed consultants to go unnoticed.
An official structure will be developed to supply payment to victims of dishonest acts, and the College of Migration and Citizenship Consultants (CICC) regulative authority will likewise be subject to increased federal oversight.
The modifications have been invited by stakeholders for offering “more teeth” to the regulator to deal with deceitful experts and offer payment to their victims, but doubts have actually been raised about how far they will go in practice.
“Many managed Canadian immigration experts (RCICs) support the spirit of the policies but feel they are more about optics than substance, provided the Carney federal government’s duplicated motto about ‘taking control’ of the Canadian migration system,” RCIC Matthew McDonald informed The PIE News. Under Canadian law, anybody who accepts payment for preparing a migration application or offering migration guidance should be licensed by the federal government, however a much bigger proportion of specialists are working outside the country and are exempt to the very same regulations.
The Canadian government and education sector have long disregarded to the numerous international education representatives who will continue to work as unauthorised professionals Matthew McDonald, controlled Canadian immigration consultant (RCIC)
While enthusiastic the changes will provide a greater sense of justice to anybody harmed, McDonald stated the guidelines would not avoid the “considerable victimisation” that occurs at the hands of unauthorised professionals (UAPs).
Though the regulations are not particularly aimed at education agents, they will alter the environment they operate in, with the broadened public register acting as a verifying tool regarding whether a representative is overcoming a legitimately licensed expert.
It aims to make due diligence more straightforward for those who follow the guidelines, but specialists have highlighted gaps in the college’s regulative powers.
“The brand-new regulations might deal with certified rule-breakers, however they not do anything to deal with the conflict of interest fundamental to the work of education representatives who are likewise UAPs. And they are globally much bigger in number.”
“The Canadian government and education sector have long disregarded to the numerous international education representatives who will continue to work as unauthorised professionals. These regulations do nothing to alter that wilful ignorance,” stated McDonald.
Others are more confident the rules will improve the quality and track record of the Canadian sector, with Carina Dipti Mathur, creator of Canada Migration and Visa (CIV) education consultancy in Singapore, hailing the modifications a “significant pivotal moment” for the industry.
But she raised concerns about the large percentage of overseas education firms that are still entirely focused on recruitment without proper migration and compliance support.
“From my experience across Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines, I would approximate that just around 10% of firms associated with Canada recruitment are directly connected to certified RCIC structures or migration legal representatives.
“The new policies will likely push more companies to either partner correctly with licensed experts or step far from providing migration suggestions completely,” she stated.
Under the brand-new guidelines, the CICC itself will likewise be held to higher public responsibility, subject to greater reporting requirements to the federal government. Minister Diab will now have the power to step in at the college’s board level to ensure against governance failure.
McDonald called these measures “a step in the right instructions” to develop trust in the regulator among RCICs– a number of whom he stated were “unimpressed with the college’s level of transparency and speed of interaction”.
As for more effects, the changes could see some specialists selecting to leave the profession, depending on how the implementation expenses are passed along to consultants.
“RCICs may also require to increase their own charges to cover the additional costs associated with building the compensation fund. That will not aid with problems of availability,” included McDonald.
< img src ="// www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E"/ > < img src="https://thepienews.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/TheStayClub-600x500-copy-1.jpg"/ >