< img src= "https://thepienews.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/photo-of-person-using-computer-3183152-scaled-1.jpg"alt=""> A trainee opens a chapter. Types the question into AI. Copies the answer. Closes the book. Assignment: done.
This is the concern for teachers throughout the world: the progressive outsourcing of thinking itself. The issue stands– a 2024 Wharton research study found trainees utilizing general purpose AI to finish assignments revealed weaker long-term outcomes. A separate analysis of countless student interactions raised comparable concerns about learners entrusting higher-order believing to AI.
Some trainees are likewise getting to university without the reading skills they require. Of the 1.4 million trainees sitting the ACT, the United States’ main college readiness assessment, just 39% met the Checking out criteria in 2025, down from 44% just 4 years earlier.
At the heart of this is active reading. Strategic highlighting, stopping briefly to question, self-testing after a challenging chapter– these are techniques utilized by active readers to much better understand what they read. They are the greatest predictors of authentic scholastic success. Yet, research study suggests these abilities are eroding.
Which raises a question: what if the exact same technology speeding up cognitive offloading could, under the right conditions, reverse it?
Over the previous academic year, we analysed over 79 million trainee interactions with Pearson eTextbooks and instructor-led courseware. This was not general-purpose AI pulling answers from the open web. These tools were developed on publisher-approved, expert-vetted content, designed around discovering science principles– triggering students to question and evaluate their own understanding instead of passively receive outputs.
What if the same innovation speeding up cognitive offloading could, under the ideal conditions, reverse it
When AI is developed this way, it does not replace active reading. It deepens it. In our research, a single interaction with a purpose-built AI research study tool made a student three times more likely to be classified as an active reader. Repeat usage pressed that to 3.5 times. Inside instructor-led courseware, the result was stronger still: 23 times most likely after a single session. Twenty-four times for repeat users.
However the finding that stuck with me was this: the trainees who got most were those who had been the most passive readers to begin with. The ones every teacher acknowledges– present but disengaged, going through the movements. Those trainees reacted most to properly designed AI support.
For those of us operating in global education, that direction matters. Trainees getting to international universities from varied linguistic backgrounds are already navigating a significant space in between the texts they have actually encountered and the ones now in front of them. The tools we pick to give them are not neutral. A purpose-built research study tool that enables students to converse with AI in over 100 languages, in their own words, about complex academic texts, starts to address that space. One that does not, substances it.
For the trainee being in a lecture hall in a language that is not their first, browsing texts more complex than anything they have actually come across in the past, the best tool at the right moment can be the difference in between falling behind and finding their footing.
Check out the current Pearson AI in active learning research findings
About the author: Sharon Hague is a global development strategist, passionate lifelong student, and previous educator with over 25 years of senior management experience at Pearson.
She currently acts as president of Pearson’s English language discovering division, the company’s fastest-growing company system, leading a global group. She is responsible for orchestrating the department’s strategy and driving a technology-powered growth plan, consisting of market expansion, product diversification, and the advancement of AI-powered tools for corporations and teachers.
Sharon likewise serves as Pearson’s UK CEO, acting as the business’s senior ambassador in its home market. Pearson is listed on the London Stock Market and is a constituent of the FTSE 100 Index.
Sharon’s previous roles consist of managing director of School Qualifications and School Evaluation, where she led international sales and operations for Pearson’s K-12 organizations. She has actually worked thoroughly with federal governments, schools, and partners to provide services that help students make progress in their lives.
< img src ="// www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E"/ > < img src="https://thepienews.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/PLE-live-news-embedded-advert-600x500-1.gif"/ >