Sudanese students impacted by the UK government’s research study visa “brake”are preparing to appeal after the High Court ruled in favour of Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, according to Sudan Scholars UK.
The group said the decision supported the government’s 18-month restriction on study visas, leaving students with completely funded master’s locations at leading UK universities unable to begin their courses this September.
“Sadly, the court has ruled in favour of the Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, promoting the decision that avoids our students from continuing their studies in the UK for 18 months,” Sudan Scholars UK said in a LinkedIn post.
The only thing preventing them from starting in September was this decision
Sudan Scholars UK
It said the students had MSc admissions with full scholarships at the universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Imperial College London and University College London.
“The only thing avoiding them from beginning in September was this choice,” the group said, including that it was dealing with its legal group to appeal.
The upgrade follows a High Court obstacle to the Home Office’s visa-brake policy, which came into force in March and stopped the issuance of research study visas to nationals of Afghanistan, Cameroon, Myanmar and Sudan.
Among the claims was brought by three Sudanese women– 2 medical professionals and a pharmacist– represented by Duncan Lewis Solicitors. The females held master’s offers from Oxford and UCL and argued that Sudan had actually been picked for a blanket constraint without evidence of visa abuse by Sudanese nationals.
They also argued that the Home Office had actually stopped working to consider alternative measures or examine their cases separately.
“Our customers argued before the High Court … that the Home Secretary had picked Sudan for the imposition of a blanket ban on an arbitrary basis, with no proof of visa abuse committed by Sudanese nationals,” Duncan Lewis solicitor Manini Menon informed The PIE News before the judgment.
The Sudanese trainees’ case was heard at the exact same time as a different legal challenge involving 4 other students impacted by the visa constraints.
Before the ruling, The PIE comprehended that Oxford had accepted keep the complaintants’ offers and scholarships open till August 31. UCL had accepted delay one complaintant’s deal by a year if the obstacle was successful, giving her time to secure financing after Chevening terminated applications from trainees impacted by the policy.
The Home Office presented the policy after stating asylum claims from visa holders from the 4 countries had risen by more than 470% over four years. It stated the step was meant to tackle abuse of the visa system.
But the policy was criticised by universities, student advocates and the Russell Group, which argued that the government had depended on uncertain data and ran the risk of harming the UK’s worldwide reputation. The Russell Group said trainees from the four nations represent less than 0.6% of global trainees in the UK.
In July, 9 universities announced online and transnational options through the Mosaik Scholarship for trainees unable to access campus-based research study.
However, sector leaders have actually said those options can not change in-person study and scholarship chances in the UK.
The PIE has actually gotten in touch with the trainees’ legal representatives for comment on the judgment, its thinking and the suggested appeal.
< img src ="// www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E"/ > < img src="https://thepienews.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/PIEoneers-600-x-500.jpg"/ >