Based on surveys of 3,469 potential trainees from 124 nations and 197 school counsellors presented at the online forum, four in five students remained confident they would study overseas, weighing an average of 2.86 locations.
Speakers argued universities risk losing candidates who have actually not yet committed if recruitment methods stop working to attend to the spaces recognized in the data.
“Institutions that see it clearly will come out ahead,” said Rohan Pasari, creator and CEO of Manifest Global.
The findings are based upon surveys of 3,469 potential students from 124 nations and 197 school counsellors, presented at the forum.
Agents from the trainee recruitment platform highlighted 3 disconnects: a gap in what universities communicate to prospective trainees, a gap in who is geared up to advise students, and a “timing gap” in when universities enter the conversation.
Institutions that see it plainly will come out ahead
Rohan Pesari, Manifest Global
The first space concerns an inequality between universities’ communications and trainees’ actual details needs. Asked what signals to them that a university will get them a task, 34% pointed to graduate employment rates and 30% to internship, placement or co-op access. Rankings and track record, the metric institutions most typically lead with, was chosen by simply 12.7%.
“You’re leading with the metric students trust least,” the research study kept in mind.
The pattern keeps in how universities interact, not just what they communicate. One institution cited sent 16 emails per trainee across the recruitment cycle, against a peer average of 26.
Regardless of sending out less, 86% of its communications were rated as appealing, compared with a peer average of 70%, “the greatest ratio in the peer group,” speakers noted.
UK-bound and US-bound students likewise prioritise different info. Around 21% of UK-bound students pointed out program fit as their main reason for selecting a location, against 12% of US-bound students, who leaned more towards institutional track record and anticipated salary outcomes.
The second space worries the readiness of school counsellors to recommend students on labour markets and work outcomes, a theme that repeated throughout the day’s conversations.
Counsellors are trainees’ single greatest information resource, pointed out by 71.9% when looking for guidance. Yet of the 197 counsellors surveyed, just 8 explained themselves as “very confident” in their understanding of present labour markets, while 38 said they were just “rather confident.”
Many update their understanding “month-to-month or less often.” As presenters put it: “The channel students trust most is flying blind on professions.”
The gap widens on emerging fields. Asked how confident they were encouraging on abilities in need in areas like AI, renewable energy and cybersecurity, only 7 counsellors said “really confident,” while 36 stated “extremely unlikely” or “slightly positive.”
One contributor argued that “it is time for worldwide groups to get together with their careers service to design, training and info for the counsellor audience”.
Speakers said trainees are significantly inquiring about graduate employability, however numerous counsellors lack the information to respond to with confidence. An Indian school counsellor said universities provide insufficient details on chances beyond the class, consisting of trainee societies, leaving counsellors “searching for the wrong terms” while attempting to prepare trainees with the skills that “make you employable.”
The 3rd space concerns when universities enter the discussion relative to when trainees are choosing. 87% of students began investigating universities before age 16, and 88% had actually already chosen which nation to study in before university outreach usually begins.
“The shortlist is often formed before you reach them,” the research discovered, concluding that “by the time you market to them, the choice is almost made”.
A various photo for the UK
Layered onto these 3 gaps is a finding particular to the UK’s competitive position. UK-bound students were less likely than US-bound peers to have actually finalised their location (58% had actually chosen, against 71% of US choosers) recommending they are “most likely still actively comparing choices”.
The two destinations are also viewed in a different way. Only 22% of UK-bound students prepared to remain in the UK after graduation, against 36% of US-bound students, with the research framing the US as “a place to stay” and the UK as “a stepping stone.” Half of those picking the UK said they would follow career opportunities “any place they lead”.
Roughly half of both UK and US choosers stated they would switch destination for a much better scholarship offer elsewhere, referred to as “the single most significant vulnerability for both”.
The discussions likewise pointed to separated strategies needed for China and India. Some 74% of Chinese trainees had currently decided on their destination, with 48% selecting the US, leaving universities “a limited window to affect their choices”.
Indian trainees were far more open: just 59% had actually settled a destination, split between India (22%), the US (20%), the UK (18%) and Singapore (8%). Some 51% percent stated they would change for a better scholarship, making them “the most price-sensitive accomplice in study” and representing “a longer recruitment window” for institutions willing to engage early.
Closing the space: whose task is it?
The workshop closed with a call to rethink how universities engage prospective students, arguing that recruitment is increasingly about showing long-term profession outcomes, “not merely promoting collaborations”.
That, speakers stated, requires better support for the counsellors who remain amongst the most influential voices in a trainee’s choice. The signal gap, the counsellor gap and the timing space are not different issues for different groups to handle. They are the exact same problem.
< img src ="// www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E"/ > < img src="https://thepienews.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/SRT-Fairs-_-Ad-600-x-500px-V2.jpg"/ >