Absenteeism is a big and seemingly intractable issue for the country’s public schools. And Michigan has among the worst presence rates in the nation. That makes it a prime target for scientists. In hundreds of schools, more than 3 out of 5 students were chronically absent before the pandemic. When classes resumed, persistent absenteeism approached 4 out of 5 trainees in the state’s worst-attended schools.
Yet a brand-new research study launched in Might uses hope. Scientists discovered that some Michigan schools appear to be considerably better than others at getting trainees to appear, and determined one intervention– frequent home visits to households whose children are absent from class– that was used more often by schools making a distinction.
Schools that were more successful in boosting attendance were much more most likely to conduct these check outs regularly– day-to-day or weekly. Regular monthly or periodic home sees did not appear to make as much difference. Schools that checked out less frequently performed about the like those that did not conduct home gos to at all.
Determining a school’s effect on attendance is challenging. If a trainee attends school 95 percent of the time, it can be hard to inform whether the trainee was already conscientious, or whether the school itself is having a positive impact.
To separate a school’s impact, scientists at the University of Michigan-Flint and Wayne State University focused on students who changed schools, such as those transitioning from middle to high school. The students themselves stayed mostly the very same while their school environments changed so researchers could more credibly estimate whether particular schools made a difference. To represent the fact that more thorough trainees may be chosen or funneled into higher-performing schools, scientists even more changed their estimations to compare students with comparable backgrounds and academic records as they switched schools.
Scientist evaluated approximately 2,700 Michigan schools in between 2022 and 2025 and divided them into quarters based on just how much they improved their trainees’ participation rates. Students in the top quarter of schools appeared for class about 7 more days each year than comparable trainees in the bottom quarter. 7 days is substantial since missing 18 days a year is the limit for persistent absenteeism.
Encouragingly, these attendance gains were not short-term. The schools that made one of the most progress tended to reveal improvement across all 3 years of the study.
But enhancement does not necessarily indicate success. A few of the most effective schools in the state still had persistent absenteeism rates above 40 or 50 percent, said Jeremy Vocalist, assistant teacher at the University of Michigan-Flint and lead author of the research study.
The schools making the most advance tend to educate lots of kids in hardship, often clustered in the state’s poorest cities, such as Detroit, Flint and Saginaw, or in economically depressed rural areas where farms are rapidly failing. Throughout the nation, absenteeism rates are greatest in poor neighborhoods where expulsions, dependency, transportation problems, health problems and family obligations disrupt school presence.
High-poverty schools know absenteeism is a problem and have various programs and staff in place to address it. Scientist wished to see if there were common techniques utilized by schools that were making development. Therefore they integrated their analysis with a Michigan school study where principals disclosed how they were tackling the problem.
That’s how the value of frequent home gos to rose to the top, which likewise supports other research in Connecticut. An extensive home visiting program to improve attendance has also revealed strong results there.
Still, these visits are not a guaranteed service. Some Michigan schools conducting weekly home sees saw no enhancement in participation– or perhaps getting worse absence. To put it simply, while lots of schools utilizing frequent home sees were successful, others were not. “They’re certainly no silver bullet,” said Singer.
Singer states that scientists need to dig deeper into what makes home visits reliable given that they are expensive and time-intensive. Possible elements include who conducts them, what time of day they happen, whether they are scheduled or surprise gos to, and what conversations occur.
Schools in the study are attempting lots of other interventions, however the researchers didn’t detect a strong connection in between the majority of those efforts and improved attendance. These other interventions include early caution systems, letters home, automated text and telephone call. Schools that had assistance from district workers, such as truancy officers or liaisons, did refrain from doing better than schools without these staffers.
Individualized and regular text were decently more common amongst more schools with improving attendance. Researchers also found that schools making more progress were slightly most likely to report actively assisting families address outside barriers such as real estate and transport.
The connection between interventions and schools that work in boosting participation is a hint about what works, but the scientists can not say whether the interventions are driving the attendance improvements. It might be that the most effective schools are doing other things not recorded in the study, such as working with especially skilled teachers or constructing more powerful relationships with students that make school feel worth going to.
The findings are a pointer that “finest practices” recommendations frequently overemphasize what researchers in fact understand. Schools can make a significant distinction in attendance, but determining really effective schools is hard, separating why they are successful is even harder, and simple services hardly ever hold up under analysis.
Contact staffwriter Jill Barshay at 212-678-3595, jillbarshay.35 on Signal, or [email protected].
This story about attending to absence in Michigan was produced by The Hechinger Report, a not-for-profit, independent wire service that covers education. Register for Evidence Pointsand other Hechinger newsletters.
Was this story practical? Leave an idea to support your education reporters.
The Hechinger Report is a nonprofit newsroom powered by reader assistance
Republish our short articles free of charge, online or in print, under an Imaginative Commons license.