The President’s Spending plan Request(PBR ), released by the White Home last week, proposes a near 70% cut to State Department research study abroad moneying and would remove or dramatically decrease lots of flagship cultural exchange programs consisting of Fulbright.
Sector leaders have said the proposals are “not surprising, but frustrating” and are advising Congress to reject Trump’s request, which would “annihilate” international exchange programs and “hinder American excellence at home and on the world phase”.
They reiterated the PBR is not law or binding, and that the proposals must pass multiple evaluations in your house and Senate before the final FY2027 is prepared.
While the Alliance for International Exchange prepares to introduce an advocacy project challenging the cuts, leaders have reason to be silently positive.
In 2015, sector mobilisation saw Trump’s proposed 93% cuts to federal exchange programs minimized to 5.5%, leading to $667 million supplied to the sector– a modest reduction on previous years.
Under the President’s most current proposals, the State Department’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) would be given just $215m for study abroad initiatives next year.
While acutely knowledgeable about the cuts’ prospective damage, executive director at the Alliance Mark Overmann stated there was “no doubt” exchanges had strong support from Congress “on both sides of the aisle”. “Congressional appropriators clearly have our back,” he added.
We fully expect Congress once again to decline this misdirected proposed cut, but we’re also not taking that assistance for granted
Mark Overmann, The Alliance for International Exchange
“We totally expect Congress once again to decline this misdirected proposed cut, however we’re likewise not taking that support for given,” stated Overmann, introducing an advocacy campaign to reveal policymakers the breadth of assistance for global exchange across the US.
The project — set to launch today — lays bare the effects of the cuts, which would get rid of the Gilman Program, the Stevens Initiative and American Overseas Research Centres, avoiding US students studying, interning, carrying out research and participating in leadership chances around the world.
America’s flagship Fulbright Program would see almost 80% of its budget slashed under the proposals, among lots of other initiatives — as set out in the Congressional Spending Plan Justification — which supporters say are essential to United States nationwide security.
In 2015, record-breaking sector mobilisation saw some 21,000 letters sent to Congress in defence of such programs, with Overmann and others vowing to do “everything in our power to ensure that occurs again this year”.
< img src ="// www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E"/ > < img src="https://thepienews.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Boundless-Learning-600x500-1.jpg"/ >